Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial

Summary Background Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2018-01, Vol.178 (1), p.114-123
Hauptverfasser: Langley, R.G., Tsai, T.‐F., Flavin, S., Song, M., Randazzo, B., Wasfi, Y., Jiang, J., Li, S., Puig, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background Guselkumab, an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant efficacy in phase III psoriasis trials. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to ustekinumab. Methods In this phase III, randomized, double‐blind study, 871 patients received open‐label ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at weeks 0 and 4. At week 16, 268 patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 2] were randomized (double‐blind) to guselkumab 100 mg or to continue ustekinumab; 585 of 871 patients (67%) with IGA 0/1 at week 16 continued open‐label ustekinumab. The primary end point was the number of visits at which randomized patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvement (from week 16) from week 28 to week 40. Improvement ≥ 90% or 100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 were also assessed. Results The mean number of visits at which patients achieved IGA 0/1 and at least a two‐grade improvemen (week 28–40) was significantly greater in the guselkumab group vs. the randomized ustekinumab group (1·5 vs. 0·7; P 
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.15750