Trends in Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Utilization in the Medicare Patient Population
Abstract Background Surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed with an open or endoscopic approach. Current literature suggests that the endoscopic approach is associated with higher costs and a steeper learning curve. This study evaluated the billing and utilization trends of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of surgical research 2017-06, Vol.214, p.9-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed with an open or endoscopic approach. Current literature suggests that the endoscopic approach is associated with higher costs and a steeper learning curve. This study evaluated the billing and utilization trends of both approaches. Methods A retrospective review of a Medicare database within the PearlDiver Supercomputer (Warsaw, IN) was performed for patients undergoing open (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) from 2005-2012. Annual utilization, charges, reimbursement, demographic data and compound annual growth rate (CAGR) were evaluated. Results Our query returned 1500603 CTS patients, of which 507924 (33.8%) and 68768 (4.6%) were surgically managed with OCTR and ECTR respectively (remainder treated conservatively). CAGR was significantly higher in ECTR (5%) than OCTR (0.9%) (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4804 1095-8673 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.055 |