Long-term follow-up of the potential benefits of early nutritional intervention in adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a pilot randomised trial

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of all patients who participated in a pilot randomised trial of an early nutritional intervention for adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer. It also sought to identify factors that predicted patient mortality. Methods All participants (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2017-11, Vol.25 (11), p.3587-3593
Hauptverfasser: Furness, Kate, Silvers, Mary Anne, Savva, June, Huggins, Catherine E., Truby, Helen, Haines, Terry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of all patients who participated in a pilot randomised trial of an early nutritional intervention for adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer. It also sought to identify factors that predicted patient mortality. Methods All participants ( n  = 21) who were randomised into the original study were followed for a maximum of 5 years and 2 months (final follow-up April 2016). The primary outcome measure was time from date of recruitment until date of death, ascertained by the Victorian Cancer Registry and/or Monash Health Scanned Medical Records. Secondary analyses were conducted to identify factors that adversely affected survival. Results At the end of the follow-up period, three patients were alive in the nutrition intervention group whilst only two patients were living from the standard care group. Visual evaluation of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a possible survival benefit from being exposed to the intervention between 6 months and 1.4 years post-recruitment, though this benefit dissipated soon after. The intervention was not associated with increased survival in univariate analyses, but was after adjustment for other factors found to adversely impact on survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.12 (95% CI 0.02–0.72) p  = 0.02). These factors were being a smoker (14.2 (1.43 to 140.67), p  = 0.02); low baseline physical functioning (1.11 (1.01 to 1.21), p  = 0.03); high baseline fatigue (1.09 (1.02–1.16), p  = 0.007); and high baseline dyspnoea (1.08 (1.02–1.13), p  = 0.003). Conclusion Early and intensive nutrition intervention may increase the survival of people with upper gastrointestinal cancer.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-017-3789-2