Stages of Change for Mammography Among Mexican Women and a Decisional Balance Comparison Across Countries

An analysis of the adoption of secondary preventive behaviors is significant in regions with disparities in mammography use and breast cancer survival. Therefore, we determined the cognitive factors and the degree to which they differentiate stages of change in mammography among Mexican women. We al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer education 2018-12, Vol.33 (6), p.1230-1238
Hauptverfasser: Salinas-Martínez, Ana María, Castañeda-Vásquez, David Emmanuel, García-Morales, Norma Guadalupe, Oliva-Sosa, Norma Edith, de-la-Garza-Salinas, Laura Hermila, Núñez-Rocha, Georgina Mayela, Ramírez-Aranda, José Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An analysis of the adoption of secondary preventive behaviors is significant in regions with disparities in mammography use and breast cancer survival. Therefore, we determined the cognitive factors and the degree to which they differentiate stages of change in mammography among Mexican women. We also compared the decisional balance performance at Mexico, Switzerland, South Korea, and the USA. A cross-sectional study was designed for women in the stages of precontemplation ( n  = 240), contemplation ( n  = 243), action ( n  = 205), maintenance ( n  = 311), and relapse ( n  = 348). We only considered those ≥40 years with no cancer history. We measured the pros , cons , and self-efficacy, among other components. The decisional balance was estimated, and the result was transformed into T-scores. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with multinomial logistic regression using precontemplation as the reference group. The decisional balance distinguished stages partially: in contemplation, the OR was 1.26 (95%CI 1.08, 1.47) and in maintenance, 1.34 (95%CI 1.13, 1.59); in action and relapse, the statistical significance was marginal ( p  
ISSN:0885-8195
1543-0154
DOI:10.1007/s13187-017-1236-1