Wei-Jin Period Xuanxue 'Neo-Daoism': Re-working the Relationship Between Confucian and Daoist Themes

In recent years, philosophical ideas developed during the Wei‐Jin period, broadly referred to as xuanxue (玄學) in Chinese and ‘Neo‐Daoism’ or ‘Dark Learning’ in English, have been accorded increasing attention in academia. This article provides an introduction to some major thinkers of the Wei‐Jin pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophy compass 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.621-631
1. Verfasser: D'Ambrosio, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In recent years, philosophical ideas developed during the Wei‐Jin period, broadly referred to as xuanxue (玄學) in Chinese and ‘Neo‐Daoism’ or ‘Dark Learning’ in English, have been accorded increasing attention in academia. This article provides an introduction to some major thinkers of the Wei‐Jin period, addressing both their original writings and recent scholarly interpretations. The article aims to demonstrate that many Wei‐Jin period intellectuals formed their theories through reinterpreting the relationship between texts associated with Daoism and Confucianism. Thinkers of this period often attempted to show how these defining ‘schools’ of pre‐Qin Chinese thought did not propose theories that were fundamentally inconsistent, and that their ideas could be woven together as elements of a coherent view. This intellectual movement can thus be, and often has been, viewed as an attempt to integrate Daoism and Confucianism. However, a more nuanced reading demonstrates that these thinkers were reworking the relationship between what were seen as predominately Daoist or Confucian themes from their very foundation. Accordingly, the common description of Wei‐Jin thinkers as ‘(Neo‐)Daoist’ is decidedly incongruous.
ISSN:1747-9991
1747-9991
DOI:10.1111/phc3.12344