Single-agent GvHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus after post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide is a valid option for haploidentical transplantation in adults with hematological malignancies
Eighty-one patients with high-risk hematological malignancies received unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplants (haploSCT) using the same protocol at four Spanish institutions. The conditioning regimen was thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine; following bone marrow or peripheral blood infusi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2017-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1273-1279 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Eighty-one patients with high-risk hematological malignancies received unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplants (haploSCT) using the same protocol at four Spanish institutions. The conditioning regimen was thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine; following bone marrow or peripheral blood infusion. GvHD prophylaxis with high-dose cyclophosphamide on days +3 and +4, and IV tacrolimus from day +5 was administered. 62% were in complete remission, 17% had received previous allogeneic SCT and 44% had a high-very high refined disease risk index. One patient had primary graft failure and three more died before +21. The median days to neutrophil and platelet recoveries were +18 and +23, respectively, and 93% achieved a full donor chimerism on day +30. At 1 year, cumulative incidences (CumInc) of non-relapse mortality and relapse were 27 and 19%. One-year overall survival and PFS were 61 and 51%. CumInc of grade II−IV and III−IV were 23 and 14%. At 30 months, CumInc of limited and extensive GvHD were 20 and 22%. In conclusion, patients with hematological malignancies who receive an unmanipulated haploSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide may benefit from less intense pharmacological prophylaxis for GvHD prophylaxis. Whether this approach potentiates the graft-versus-tumor effect and decreases relapses requires further investigation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-3369 1476-5365 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bmt.2017.111 |