Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars and biosugars in atmospheric aerosol

An interlaboratory comparison was performed to evaluate the analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars – levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan – and biosugars – arabitol, glucose and mannitol – in atmospheric aerosol. The performance of 10 laboratories in Italy currently involved in such an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2017-10, Vol.184, p.269-277
Hauptverfasser: Chiara Pietrogrande, M., Barbaro, Elena, Bove, M. Chiara, Clauser, Giuseppe, Colombi, Cristina, Corbella, Lorenza, Cuccia, Eleonora, Dalla Torre, Stefano, Decesari, Stefano, Fermo, Paola, Gambaro, Andrea, Gianelle, Vorne, Ielpo, Pierina, Larcher, Roberto, Lazzeri, Paolo, Massabò, Dario, Melchionna, Gerardo, Nardin, Tiziana, Paglione, Marco, Perrino, Cinzia, Prati, Paolo, Visentin, Marco, Zanca, Nicola, Zangrando, Roberta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An interlaboratory comparison was performed to evaluate the analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars – levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan – and biosugars – arabitol, glucose and mannitol – in atmospheric aerosol. The performance of 10 laboratories in Italy currently involved in such analyses was investigated on twenty-six PM (particulate matter) ambient filters, three synthetic PM filters and three aqueous standard solutions. An acceptable interlaboratory variability was found, determined as the mean relative standard deviation (RSD%) of the results from the participating laboratories, with the mean RSD% values ranging from 25% to 46% and decreasing with increasing sugar concentration. The investigated methods show good accuracy, evaluated as the percentage error (ε%) related to mean values, since method biases ranged within ±20% for most of the analytes measured in the different laboratories. The detailed investigation (ANOVA analysis at p 
ISSN:0045-6535
1879-1298
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.131