All-Cause Mortality After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
OBJECTIVE:To compare all-cause mortality between women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery with those who underwent conventional surgery for stage I ovarian cancer. METHODS:In a cohort study using the National Cancer Database, we identified women younger than 40 years diagnosed with stage IA and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2017-07, Vol.130 (1), p.71-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:To compare all-cause mortality between women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery with those who underwent conventional surgery for stage I ovarian cancer.
METHODS:In a cohort study using the National Cancer Database, we identified women younger than 40 years diagnosed with stage IA and unilateral IC epithelial ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2012. Fertility-sparing surgery was defined as conservation of one ovary and the uterus. The primary outcome was time from diagnosis to death. We used propensity score methods to assemble a cohort of women who underwent fertility-sparing or conventional surgery but were otherwise similar on observed covariates and conducted survival analyses using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS:We identified 1,726 women with stage IA and unilateral IC epithelial ovarian cancer of whom 825 (47.8%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Fertility-sparing surgery was associated with younger age, residence in the northeastern and western United States, and serous or mucinous histology (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
DOI: | 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002102 |