Association between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Aim To examine the overall survival differences for the following neoadjuvant therapy modalities – no therapy, chemotherapy alone, radiation alone and chemoradiation – in a large cohort of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Method Adults with clinical Stage II and III rectal adenocarcinom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2017-12, Vol.19 (12), p.1058-1066
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Z., Adam, M. A., Kim, J., Turner, M. C., Fisher, D. A., Choudhury, K. R., Czito, B. G., Migaly, J., Mantyh, C. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To examine the overall survival differences for the following neoadjuvant therapy modalities – no therapy, chemotherapy alone, radiation alone and chemoradiation – in a large cohort of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Method Adults with clinical Stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma were selected from the National Cancer Database and grouped by type of neoadjuvant therapy received: no therapy, chemotherapy only, radiotherapy only or chemoradiation. Multivariable regression methods were used to compare adjusted differences in perioperative outcomes and overall survival. Results Among 32 978 patients included, 9714 (29.5%) received no neoadjuvant therapy, 890 (2.7%) chemotherapy only, 1170 (3.5%) radiotherapy only and 21 204 (64.3%) chemoradiation. Compared with no therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone were not associated with any adjusted differences in surgical margin positivity, permanent colostomy rate or overall survival (all P > 0.05). With adjustment, neoadjuvant chemoradiation vs no therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of surgical margin positivity (OR 0.74, P 
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/codi.13754