Evaluation of the VeriStrat® serum protein test in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung treated with second-line afatinib or erlotinib in the phase III LUX-Lung 8 study

Highlights • Clinical utility of the VeriStrat serum protein test was assessed in LUX-Lung 8. • Patients were classified as VeriStrat ‘Good’ (VS-G) or VeriStrat ‘Poor’ (VS-P). • VS-G classification is associated with favorable survival outcomes versus VS-P. • In VS-G patients, survival outcomes are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2017-07, Vol.109, p.101-108
Hauptverfasser: Gadgeel, Shirish, Goss, Glenwood, Soria, Jean-Charles, Felip, Enriqueta, Georgoulias, Vassilis, Lu, Shun, Cobo, Manuel, Syrigos, Konstantinos, Lee, Ki Hyeong, Göker, Erdem, Guclu, Salih Z, Isla, Dolores, Morabito, Alessandro, Dupuis, Nicholas, Bühnemann, Claudia, Krämer, Nicole, Solca, Flavio, Ehrnrooth, Eva, Ardizzoni, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Highlights • Clinical utility of the VeriStrat serum protein test was assessed in LUX-Lung 8. • Patients were classified as VeriStrat ‘Good’ (VS-G) or VeriStrat ‘Poor’ (VS-P). • VS-G classification is associated with favorable survival outcomes versus VS-P. • In VS-G patients, survival outcomes are superior with afatinib versus erlotinib.
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.05.010