Comparison of three different types of scaffolds preseeded with human bone marrow mononuclear cells on the bone healing in a femoral critical size defect model of the athymic rat

Large bone defects often pose major difficulties in orthopaedic surgery. The application of long‐term cultured stem cells combined with a scaffold lead to a significant improvement of bone healing in recent experiments but is strongly restricted by European Union law. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 2018-03, Vol.12 (3), p.653-666
Hauptverfasser: Janko, Maren, Sahm, Julian, Schaible, Alexander, Brune, Jan C., Bellen, Marlene, Schroder, Katrin, Seebach, Caroline, Marzi, Ingo, Henrich, Dirk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 666
container_issue 3
container_start_page 653
container_title Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
container_volume 12
creator Janko, Maren
Sahm, Julian
Schaible, Alexander
Brune, Jan C.
Bellen, Marlene
Schroder, Katrin
Seebach, Caroline
Marzi, Ingo
Henrich, Dirk
description Large bone defects often pose major difficulties in orthopaedic surgery. The application of long‐term cultured stem cells combined with a scaffold lead to a significant improvement of bone healing in recent experiments but is strongly restricted by European Union law. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMC), however, can be isolated and transplanted within a few hours and have been proven effective in experimental models of bone healing. The effectivity of the BMC‐supported therapy might be influenced by the type of scaffold. Hence, we compared three different scaffolds serving as a carrier for BMC in a rat femoral critical size defect with regard to the osteogenic activity in the defect zone. Human demineralized bone matrix (DBM), bovine cancellous bone hydroxyapatite ceramic (BS), or β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) were seeded with human BMC and hereafter implanted into critically sized bone defects of male athymic nude rats. Autologous bone served as a control. Gene activity was measured after 1 week, and bone formation was analysed histologically and radiologically after 8 weeks. Generally, regenerative gene expression (BMP2, RUNX2, VEGF, SDF‐1, and RANKL) as well as bony bridging and callus formation was observed to be most pronounced in defects filled with autologous bone, followed in descending order by DBM, β‐TCP, and BS. Although DBM was superior in most aspects of bone regeneration analysed in comparison to β‐TCP and BS, the level of autologous bone could not be attained.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/term.2484
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903165979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1903165979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-28553f620b32adc5bc1d0f0d5bbc8626b55a7839abe84c95783561a00f99775c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2P1SAUhhujcT504R8wJG50cWcoLZQuzc3omIwxMeOaUHqwTPioQHNz52f5C6X26sLEFSfw8HAOb1W9qvFVjTG5zhDdFWl5-6Q6r_uG7DqM6dNTzQhtz6qLlB7KJmW0eV6dEU5bTlp2Xv3cBzfLaFLwKGiUpwiARqM1RPAZ5eMMaT1ISmod7JjQHCEBjDCig8kTmhYnPRqCB-RkjOGAXPDBL8qCjEiBteW-L2LYoAmkNf47Mh5JpMGFKC1S0WSjSpHMY3keNKhcPCPYrSlAMk9HZxSKMr-onmlpE7w8rZfVtw839_vb3d2Xj5_27-92quG83ZUZaaMZwUND5KjooOoRazzSYVCcETZQKjve9HIA3qqelpqyWmKs-77rqGouq7ebd47hxwIpC2fSOpD0EJYk6h43NaN91xf0zT_oQ1iiL90JgmvSY45ZW6h3G6ViSCmCFnM05dOOosZiDVKsQYo1yMK-PhmXwcH4l_yTXAGuN-BgLBz_bxL3N18__1b-Au0QqqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012908064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three different types of scaffolds preseeded with human bone marrow mononuclear cells on the bone healing in a femoral critical size defect model of the athymic rat</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Janko, Maren ; Sahm, Julian ; Schaible, Alexander ; Brune, Jan C. ; Bellen, Marlene ; Schroder, Katrin ; Seebach, Caroline ; Marzi, Ingo ; Henrich, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Janko, Maren ; Sahm, Julian ; Schaible, Alexander ; Brune, Jan C. ; Bellen, Marlene ; Schroder, Katrin ; Seebach, Caroline ; Marzi, Ingo ; Henrich, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>Large bone defects often pose major difficulties in orthopaedic surgery. The application of long‐term cultured stem cells combined with a scaffold lead to a significant improvement of bone healing in recent experiments but is strongly restricted by European Union law. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMC), however, can be isolated and transplanted within a few hours and have been proven effective in experimental models of bone healing. The effectivity of the BMC‐supported therapy might be influenced by the type of scaffold. Hence, we compared three different scaffolds serving as a carrier for BMC in a rat femoral critical size defect with regard to the osteogenic activity in the defect zone. Human demineralized bone matrix (DBM), bovine cancellous bone hydroxyapatite ceramic (BS), or β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) were seeded with human BMC and hereafter implanted into critically sized bone defects of male athymic nude rats. Autologous bone served as a control. Gene activity was measured after 1 week, and bone formation was analysed histologically and radiologically after 8 weeks. Generally, regenerative gene expression (BMP2, RUNX2, VEGF, SDF‐1, and RANKL) as well as bony bridging and callus formation was observed to be most pronounced in defects filled with autologous bone, followed in descending order by DBM, β‐TCP, and BS. Although DBM was superior in most aspects of bone regeneration analysed in comparison to β‐TCP and BS, the level of autologous bone could not be attained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7005</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/term.2484</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28548246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Animal models ; athymic rat ; Autografts ; beta tricalcium phosphate ; Biocompatibility ; Biomedical materials ; Bone growth ; Bone healing ; Bone marrow ; bone marrow mononuclear cells ; Bone marrow transplantation ; Bone matrix ; Bone morphogenetic protein 2 ; Bone surgery ; Calcium phosphates ; Callus ; Cancellous bone ; Cbfa-1 protein ; Defects ; demineralized bone matrix ; Demineralizing ; experimental study ; Femur ; Gene expression ; Healing ; Hydroxyapatite ; large bone defect ; Leukocytes (mononuclear) ; Osteogenesis ; Rats ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; Regenerative medicine ; Scaffolds ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Surgical implants ; Tissue engineering ; TRANCE protein ; Tricalcium phosphate ; Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><ispartof>Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2018-03, Vol.12 (3), p.653-666</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-28553f620b32adc5bc1d0f0d5bbc8626b55a7839abe84c95783561a00f99775c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-28553f620b32adc5bc1d0f0d5bbc8626b55a7839abe84c95783561a00f99775c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6746-3400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fterm.2484$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fterm.2484$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28548246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janko, Maren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahm, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaible, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brune, Jan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellen, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebach, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzi, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrich, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three different types of scaffolds preseeded with human bone marrow mononuclear cells on the bone healing in a femoral critical size defect model of the athymic rat</title><title>Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine</title><addtitle>J Tissue Eng Regen Med</addtitle><description>Large bone defects often pose major difficulties in orthopaedic surgery. The application of long‐term cultured stem cells combined with a scaffold lead to a significant improvement of bone healing in recent experiments but is strongly restricted by European Union law. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMC), however, can be isolated and transplanted within a few hours and have been proven effective in experimental models of bone healing. The effectivity of the BMC‐supported therapy might be influenced by the type of scaffold. Hence, we compared three different scaffolds serving as a carrier for BMC in a rat femoral critical size defect with regard to the osteogenic activity in the defect zone. Human demineralized bone matrix (DBM), bovine cancellous bone hydroxyapatite ceramic (BS), or β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) were seeded with human BMC and hereafter implanted into critically sized bone defects of male athymic nude rats. Autologous bone served as a control. Gene activity was measured after 1 week, and bone formation was analysed histologically and radiologically after 8 weeks. Generally, regenerative gene expression (BMP2, RUNX2, VEGF, SDF‐1, and RANKL) as well as bony bridging and callus formation was observed to be most pronounced in defects filled with autologous bone, followed in descending order by DBM, β‐TCP, and BS. Although DBM was superior in most aspects of bone regeneration analysed in comparison to β‐TCP and BS, the level of autologous bone could not be attained.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>athymic rat</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>beta tricalcium phosphate</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>bone marrow mononuclear cells</subject><subject>Bone marrow transplantation</subject><subject>Bone matrix</subject><subject>Bone morphogenetic protein 2</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Calcium phosphates</subject><subject>Callus</subject><subject>Cancellous bone</subject><subject>Cbfa-1 protein</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>demineralized bone matrix</subject><subject>Demineralizing</subject><subject>experimental study</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>large bone defect</subject><subject>Leukocytes (mononuclear)</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>Regenerative medicine</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>TRANCE protein</subject><subject>Tricalcium phosphate</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><issn>1932-6254</issn><issn>1932-7005</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU2P1SAUhhujcT504R8wJG50cWcoLZQuzc3omIwxMeOaUHqwTPioQHNz52f5C6X26sLEFSfw8HAOb1W9qvFVjTG5zhDdFWl5-6Q6r_uG7DqM6dNTzQhtz6qLlB7KJmW0eV6dEU5bTlp2Xv3cBzfLaFLwKGiUpwiARqM1RPAZ5eMMaT1ISmod7JjQHCEBjDCig8kTmhYnPRqCB-RkjOGAXPDBL8qCjEiBteW-L2LYoAmkNf47Mh5JpMGFKC1S0WSjSpHMY3keNKhcPCPYrSlAMk9HZxSKMr-onmlpE7w8rZfVtw839_vb3d2Xj5_27-92quG83ZUZaaMZwUND5KjooOoRazzSYVCcETZQKjve9HIA3qqelpqyWmKs-77rqGouq7ebd47hxwIpC2fSOpD0EJYk6h43NaN91xf0zT_oQ1iiL90JgmvSY45ZW6h3G6ViSCmCFnM05dOOosZiDVKsQYo1yMK-PhmXwcH4l_yTXAGuN-BgLBz_bxL3N18__1b-Au0QqqQ</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Janko, Maren</creator><creator>Sahm, Julian</creator><creator>Schaible, Alexander</creator><creator>Brune, Jan C.</creator><creator>Bellen, Marlene</creator><creator>Schroder, Katrin</creator><creator>Seebach, Caroline</creator><creator>Marzi, Ingo</creator><creator>Henrich, Dirk</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6746-3400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Comparison of three different types of scaffolds preseeded with human bone marrow mononuclear cells on the bone healing in a femoral critical size defect model of the athymic rat</title><author>Janko, Maren ; Sahm, Julian ; Schaible, Alexander ; Brune, Jan C. ; Bellen, Marlene ; Schroder, Katrin ; Seebach, Caroline ; Marzi, Ingo ; Henrich, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-28553f620b32adc5bc1d0f0d5bbc8626b55a7839abe84c95783561a00f99775c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>athymic rat</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>beta tricalcium phosphate</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>bone marrow mononuclear cells</topic><topic>Bone marrow transplantation</topic><topic>Bone matrix</topic><topic>Bone morphogenetic protein 2</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Calcium phosphates</topic><topic>Callus</topic><topic>Cancellous bone</topic><topic>Cbfa-1 protein</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>demineralized bone matrix</topic><topic>Demineralizing</topic><topic>experimental study</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>large bone defect</topic><topic>Leukocytes (mononuclear)</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>Regenerative medicine</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>TRANCE protein</topic><topic>Tricalcium phosphate</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janko, Maren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahm, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaible, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brune, Jan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellen, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroder, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebach, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzi, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrich, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janko, Maren</au><au>Sahm, Julian</au><au>Schaible, Alexander</au><au>Brune, Jan C.</au><au>Bellen, Marlene</au><au>Schroder, Katrin</au><au>Seebach, Caroline</au><au>Marzi, Ingo</au><au>Henrich, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three different types of scaffolds preseeded with human bone marrow mononuclear cells on the bone healing in a femoral critical size defect model of the athymic rat</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Tissue Eng Regen Med</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>653-666</pages><issn>1932-6254</issn><eissn>1932-7005</eissn><abstract>Large bone defects often pose major difficulties in orthopaedic surgery. The application of long‐term cultured stem cells combined with a scaffold lead to a significant improvement of bone healing in recent experiments but is strongly restricted by European Union law. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMC), however, can be isolated and transplanted within a few hours and have been proven effective in experimental models of bone healing. The effectivity of the BMC‐supported therapy might be influenced by the type of scaffold. Hence, we compared three different scaffolds serving as a carrier for BMC in a rat femoral critical size defect with regard to the osteogenic activity in the defect zone. Human demineralized bone matrix (DBM), bovine cancellous bone hydroxyapatite ceramic (BS), or β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) were seeded with human BMC and hereafter implanted into critically sized bone defects of male athymic nude rats. Autologous bone served as a control. Gene activity was measured after 1 week, and bone formation was analysed histologically and radiologically after 8 weeks. Generally, regenerative gene expression (BMP2, RUNX2, VEGF, SDF‐1, and RANKL) as well as bony bridging and callus formation was observed to be most pronounced in defects filled with autologous bone, followed in descending order by DBM, β‐TCP, and BS. Although DBM was superior in most aspects of bone regeneration analysed in comparison to β‐TCP and BS, the level of autologous bone could not be attained.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>28548246</pmid><doi>10.1002/term.2484</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6746-3400</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6254
ispartof Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2018-03, Vol.12 (3), p.653-666
issn 1932-6254
1932-7005
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903165979
source Wiley Journals
subjects Animal models
athymic rat
Autografts
beta tricalcium phosphate
Biocompatibility
Biomedical materials
Bone growth
Bone healing
Bone marrow
bone marrow mononuclear cells
Bone marrow transplantation
Bone matrix
Bone morphogenetic protein 2
Bone surgery
Calcium phosphates
Callus
Cancellous bone
Cbfa-1 protein
Defects
demineralized bone matrix
Demineralizing
experimental study
Femur
Gene expression
Healing
Hydroxyapatite
large bone defect
Leukocytes (mononuclear)
Osteogenesis
Rats
Regeneration
Regeneration (physiology)
Regenerative medicine
Scaffolds
Stem cell transplantation
Stem cells
Surgical implants
Tissue engineering
TRANCE protein
Tricalcium phosphate
Vascular endothelial growth factor
title Comparison of three different types of scaffolds preseeded with human bone marrow mononuclear cells on the bone healing in a femoral critical size defect model of the athymic rat
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20different%20types%20of%20scaffolds%20preseeded%20with%20human%20bone%20marrow%20mononuclear%20cells%20on%20the%20bone%20healing%20in%20a%20femoral%20critical%20size%20defect%20model%20of%20the%20athymic%20rat&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tissue%20engineering%20and%20regenerative%20medicine&rft.au=Janko,%20Maren&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=653-666&rft.issn=1932-6254&rft.eissn=1932-7005&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/term.2484&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903165979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012908064&rft_id=info:pmid/28548246&rfr_iscdi=true