Motor function domains in alternating hemiplegia of childhood

Aim To characterize motor function profiles in alternating hemiplegia of childhood, and to investigate interrelationships between these domains and with age. Method We studied a cohort of 23 patients (9 males, 14 females; mean age 9y 4mo, range 4mo–43y) who underwent standardized tests to assess gro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental medicine and child neurology 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.822-828
Hauptverfasser: Masoud, Melanie, Gordon, Kelly, Hall, Amanda, Jasien, Joan, Lardinois, Kara, Uchitel, Julie, Mclean, Melissa, Prange, Lyndsey, Wuchich, Jeffrey, Mikati, Mohamad A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To characterize motor function profiles in alternating hemiplegia of childhood, and to investigate interrelationships between these domains and with age. Method We studied a cohort of 23 patients (9 males, 14 females; mean age 9y 4mo, range 4mo–43y) who underwent standardized tests to assess gross motor, upper extremity motor control, motor speech, and dysphagia functions. Results Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Gross Motor Function Measure‐88 (GMFM‐88), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Revised Melbourne Assessment (MA2) scales manifested predominantly mild impairments; motor speech, moderate to severe; Modified Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (M‐DOSS), mild‐to moderate deficits. GMFCS correlated with GMFM‐88 scores (Pearson's correlation, p=0.002), MACS (p=0.038), and MA2 fluency (p=0.005) and accuracy (p=0.038) scores. GMFCS did not correlate with motor speech (p=0.399), MA2 dexterity (p=0.247), range of motion (p=0.063), or M‐DOSS (p=0.856). Motor speech was more severely impaired than the GMFCS (p
ISSN:0012-1622
1469-8749
DOI:10.1111/dmcn.13443