Anterior single implants with different neck designs: 5 Year results of a randomized clinical trial
Background The design of the implant neck might be significant for preservation of marginal bone. Purpose To compare the 5‐year radiographic and clinical outcome of single anterior implants provided with a smooth neck, a rough neck or a scalloped rough neck. Materials and Methods 93 Patients with a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2017-08, Vol.19 (4), p.717-724 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The design of the implant neck might be significant for preservation of marginal bone.
Purpose
To compare the 5‐year radiographic and clinical outcome of single anterior implants provided with a smooth neck, a rough neck or a scalloped rough neck.
Materials and Methods
93 Patients with a missing anterior tooth in the maxilla were included. At random, patients received an implant with a 1.5 mm smooth neck (“smooth group”), a rough neck with grooves (“rough group”) or a scalloped rough neck with grooves (“scalloped group”). Implants were installed in healed sites. Follow‐up visits were conducted after final crown delivery and 1 year and 5 years later.
Results
Scalloped implants showed significantly more initial marginal bone resorption. The total amount of bone loss was 1.26 ± 0.90 mm in the smooth group, 1.20 ± 1.1 mm in the rough group and 2.28 ± 0.97 mm in the scalloped group (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1523-0899 1708-8208 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cid.12498 |