A Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional Healing Assessment after Endodontic Surgery Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Volumes or Periapical Radiographs

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the assessment of healing after endodontic microsurgery using 2-dimensional (2D) periapical films versus 3-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging. Methods The healing of 51 teeth from 44 patients was evaluated using M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2017-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1072-1079
Hauptverfasser: Schloss, Tom, DMD, MSc, Sonntag, David, DMD, PhD, Kohli, Meetu R., BS, DMD, Setzer, Frank C., DMD, PhD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the assessment of healing after endodontic microsurgery using 2-dimensional (2D) periapical films versus 3-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging. Methods The healing of 51 teeth from 44 patients was evaluated using Molven's criteria (2D) and modified PENN 3D criteria. The absolute area (2D) and volume (3D) changes of apical lesions preoperatively and at follow-up were calculated by segmentation using OsiriX software (Pixmeo, Bernex, Switzerland) and ITK-Snap (free software). Results There was a significant difference between the mean preoperative lesion volumes of 95.34 mm3 ( n  = 51, standard deviation [SD] ±196.28 mm3 ) versus 6.48 mm3 ( n  = 51, SD ±17.70 mm3 ) at follow-up ( P  
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.007