The influence of non‐rigid anatomy and patient positioning on endoscopy‐CT image registration in the head and neck

Purpose To assess the influence of non‐rigid anatomy and differences in patient positioning between CT acquisition and endoscopic examination on endoscopy‐CT image registration in the head and neck. Methods Radiotherapy planning CTs and 31–35 daily treatment‐room CTs were acquired for nineteen patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2017-08, Vol.44 (8), p.4159-4168
Hauptverfasser: Ingram, W. Scott, Yang, Jinzhong, Wendt, Richard, Beadle, Beth M., Rao, Arvind, Wang, Xin A., Court, Laurence E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To assess the influence of non‐rigid anatomy and differences in patient positioning between CT acquisition and endoscopic examination on endoscopy‐CT image registration in the head and neck. Methods Radiotherapy planning CTs and 31–35 daily treatment‐room CTs were acquired for nineteen patients. Diagnostic CTs were acquired for thirteen of the patients. The surfaces of the airways were segmented on all scans and triangular meshes were created to render virtual endoscopic images with a calibrated pinhole model of an endoscope. The virtual images were used to take projective measurements throughout the meshes, with reference measurements defined as those taken on the planning CTs and test measurements defined as those taken on the daily or diagnostic CTs. The influence of non‐rigid anatomy was quantified by 3D distance errors between reference and test measurements on the daily CTs, and the influence of patient positioning was quantified by 3D distance errors between reference and test measurements on the diagnostic CTs. The daily CT measurements were also used to investigate the influences of camera‐to‐surface distance, surface angle, and the interval of time between scans. Results Average errors in the daily CTs were 0.36 ± 0.61 cm in the nasal cavity, 0.58 ± 0.83 cm in the naso‐ and oropharynx, and 0.47 ± 0.73 cm in the hypopharynx and larynx. Average errors in the diagnostic CTs in those regions were 0.52 ± 0.69 cm, 0.65 ± 0.84 cm, and 0.69 ± 0.90 cm, respectively. All CTs had errors heavily skewed towards 0, albeit with large outliers. Large camera‐to‐surface distances were found to increase the errors, but the angle at which the camera viewed the surface had no effect. The errors in the Day 1 and Day 15 CTs were found to be significantly smaller than those in the Day 30 CTs (P 
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1002/mp.12352