Physiological responses to incremental, interval, and continuous counterweighted single-leg and double-leg cycling at the same relative intensities

Purpose We compared physiological responses to incremental, interval, and continuous counterweighted single-leg and double-leg cycling at the same relative intensities. The primary hypothesis was that the counterweight method would elicit greater normalized power (i.e., power/active leg), greater el...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of applied physiology 2017-07, Vol.117 (7), p.1423-1435
Hauptverfasser: MacInnis, Martin J., Morris, Nathaniel, Sonne, Michael W., Zuniga, Amanda Farias, Keir, Peter J., Potvin, Jim R., Gibala, Martin J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose We compared physiological responses to incremental, interval, and continuous counterweighted single-leg and double-leg cycling at the same relative intensities. The primary hypothesis was that the counterweight method would elicit greater normalized power (i.e., power/active leg), greater electromyography (EMG) responses, and lower cardiorespiratory demand. Methods Graded-exercise tests performed by 12 men (age: 21 ± 2 years; BMI: 24 ± 3 kg/m 2 ) initially established that peak oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 peak ; 76 ± 8.4%), expired ventilation ( V ˙ E peak ; 71 ± 6.8%), carbon dioxide production ( V ˙ CO 2 peak ; 71 ± 6.8%), heart rate (HRpeak; 91 ± 5.3%), and power output (PPO; 56 ± 3.6%) were lower during single-leg compared to double-leg cycling (main effect of mode; p  
ISSN:1439-6319
1439-6327
DOI:10.1007/s00421-017-3635-8