Physiological responses to incremental, interval, and continuous counterweighted single-leg and double-leg cycling at the same relative intensities
Purpose We compared physiological responses to incremental, interval, and continuous counterweighted single-leg and double-leg cycling at the same relative intensities. The primary hypothesis was that the counterweight method would elicit greater normalized power (i.e., power/active leg), greater el...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of applied physiology 2017-07, Vol.117 (7), p.1423-1435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
We compared physiological responses to incremental, interval, and continuous counterweighted single-leg and double-leg cycling at the same relative intensities. The primary hypothesis was that the counterweight method would elicit greater normalized power (i.e., power/active leg), greater electromyography (EMG) responses, and lower cardiorespiratory demand.
Methods
Graded-exercise tests performed by 12 men (age: 21 ± 2 years; BMI: 24 ± 3 kg/m
2
) initially established that peak oxygen uptake (
V
˙
O
2
peak
; 76 ± 8.4%), expired ventilation (
V
˙
E
peak
; 71 ± 6.8%), carbon dioxide production (
V
˙
CO
2
peak
; 71 ± 6.8%), heart rate (HRpeak; 91 ± 5.3%), and power output (PPO; 56 ± 3.6%) were lower during single-leg compared to double-leg cycling (main effect of mode;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1439-6319 1439-6327 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00421-017-3635-8 |