Determining fitting ranges of various bone conduction hearing aids

Objectives To define fitting ranges for nine bone conduction devices (BCDs) over different frequencies based on the device's maximum power output (MPO) and to validate the assessment of MPO of BCDs in the ear canal. Background Maximum power output (MPO) is an important characteristic when fitti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical otolaryngology 2018-02, Vol.43 (1), p.68-75
Hauptverfasser: Barneveld, D.C.P.B.M., Kok, H.J.W., Noten, J.F.P., Bosman, A.J., Snik, A.F.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To define fitting ranges for nine bone conduction devices (BCDs) over different frequencies based on the device's maximum power output (MPO) and to validate the assessment of MPO of BCDs in the ear canal. Background Maximum power output (MPO) is an important characteristic when fitting BCDs. It is the highest output level a device can deliver and is one of the major determinants of a device's fitting range. A skull simulator can be used to verify MPO of percutaneous BCDs. No such simulator is available for active and passive transcutaneous devices. Design The MPO of nine different BCDs was assessed either by real‐ear measurements and/or with skull simulator measurements. Main outcome measures MPO and cross‐validation of the methods using the Bland–Altman method. Results Percutaneous BCDs have higher MPO levels compared to active and passive transcutaneous devices. This results in a wide dynamic range of hearing for percutaneous devices. Moreover, the assessment of MPO by real‐ear measurements was validated. Conclusion Based on MPO data, fitting ranges were defined for nine BCDs over seven frequencies.
ISSN:1749-4478
1749-4486
DOI:10.1111/coa.12901