Impact of Institutional and Operator Volume on Short-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Japanese Nationwide Registry
The aim of this study was to assess the volume-outcome relationship for PCI within the nationwide registration system in Japan. The effect of site and operator case load for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcomes has not been investigated thoroughly in non-Western regions. In the prese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2017-05, Vol.10 (9), p.918-927 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of this study was to assess the volume-outcome relationship for PCI within the nationwide registration system in Japan.
The effect of site and operator case load for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on outcomes has not been investigated thoroughly in non-Western regions.
In the present study, PCI procedural data recorded between January 2014 and December 2015 in the Japanese PCI registry, a nationwide registration system, were analyzed. Institutions and operators were categorized into deciles based on the number of PCIs performed per year. Odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital mortality and the composite endpoint (in-hospital death and periprocedural complications) were estimated for each decile (with the lowest volume group as a reference group).
A total of 323,322 PCIs (at 625 hospitals [median PCI cases/year: 216; quartiles: 121 to 332] by 4,211 operators [median PCI cases/year: 28; quartiles: 10 to 56]) were analyzed, of which 2,959 patients (0.9%) and 7,205 patients (2.2%) experienced in-hospital mortality and the composite endpoint after PCI, respectively. The adjusted risk for in-hospital mortality and the composite endpoint was significantly higher in hospitals included in the lowest decile ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1876-7605 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.015 |