ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Extremity Joint Pain—Suspected Inflammatory Arthritis

Abstract Evaluation for suspected inflammatory arthritis as a cause for chronic extremity joint pain often relies on imaging. This review first discusses the characteristic osseous and soft tissue abnormalities seen with inflammatory arthritis and how they may be imaged. It is essential that imaging...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017-05, Vol.14 (5), p.S81-S89
Hauptverfasser: Jacobson, Jon A., MD, Roberts, Catherine C., MD, Bencardino, Jenny T., MD, Appel, Marc, MD, Arnold, Erin, MD, Baccei, Steven J., MD, Cassidy, R. Carter, MD, Chang, Eric Y., MD, Fox, Michael G., MD, Greenspan, Bennett S., MD, MS, Gyftopoulos, Soterios, MD, Hochman, Mary G., MD, MBA, Mintz, Douglas N., MD, Newman, Joel S., MD, Rosenberg, Zehava S., MD, Shah, Nehal A., MD, Small, Kirstin M., MD, Weissman, Barbara N., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Evaluation for suspected inflammatory arthritis as a cause for chronic extremity joint pain often relies on imaging. This review first discusses the characteristic osseous and soft tissue abnormalities seen with inflammatory arthritis and how they may be imaged. It is essential that imaging results are interpreted in the context of clinical and serologic results to add specificity as there is significant overlap of imaging findings among the various types of arthritis. This review provides recommendations for imaging evaluation of specific types of inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, gout, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate disease (or pseudogout), and erosive osteoarthritis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
ISSN:1546-1440
1558-349X
DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.006