Comparison of the effects of desloratadine 5‐mg daily and placebo on nasal airflow and seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms induced by grass pollen exposure

Background: Nasal congestion is a chronic symptom of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) that is often difficult to treat with antihistamines. Desloratadine, a new, potent, H1‐receptor antagonist has been shown to decrease nasal congestion in clinical trials and to maintain nasal airflow in response to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Allergy (Copenhagen) 2003-06, Vol.58 (6), p.481-485
Hauptverfasser: Horak, F., Stübner, P., Zieglmeyer, R., Harris, A. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Nasal congestion is a chronic symptom of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) that is often difficult to treat with antihistamines. Desloratadine, a new, potent, H1‐receptor antagonist has been shown to decrease nasal congestion in clinical trials and to maintain nasal airflow in response to grass pollen exposure. We compared the effects of desloratadine 5 mg and placebo on nasal airflow, nasal secretion weights and SAR symptoms, including nasal congestion, in patients exposed to grass pollen in an environmental exposure unit. Methods: Forty‐six grass pollen allergic SAR patients received desloratadine or placebo for 7 days, followed by a 10‐day washout, and then crossed over to the other treatment for 7 days. A 6‐h allergen exposure was performed at the end of each treatment period. Results: Desloratadine was significantly superior to placebo in maintaining nasal airflow (P≤ 0.014) and lessening the increase in nasal secretion weights (P 
ISSN:0105-4538
1398-9995
DOI:10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00148.x