Role of mechanical curettage with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis in cigarette smokers: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Highlights • At baseline, PI, BOP and PPD were comparable among individuals in both groups. • PI and BOP were significantly higher in Group-B than Group-A at 12-weeks follow-up. • There was no difference in BOP in both groups at baseline and at follow-up. • In smokers, MC + aPDT is more effective th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2017-06, Vol.18, p.331-334
Hauptverfasser:	Javed, Fawad, BinShabaib, Munerah Saleh, Alharthi, Shatha Subhi, Qadri, Talat
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy Bleeding on probing Cigarette smoking Cigarette Smoking - adverse effects Combined Modality Therapy - methods Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Internal Medicine Male Mechanical curettage Middle Aged Peri-Implantitis - etiology Peri-Implantitis - therapy Photochemotherapy - methods Plaque index Probing pocket depth Stomatitis - etiology Stomatitis - therapy Subgingival Curettage - methods Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Highlights • At baseline, PI, BOP and PPD were comparable among individuals in both groups. • PI and BOP were significantly higher in Group-B than Group-A at 12-weeks follow-up. • There was no difference in BOP in both groups at baseline and at follow-up. • In smokers, MC + aPDT is more effective than MC for treating peri-implant mucositis.
ISSN:	1572-1000 1873-1597
DOI:	10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.04.015