Clinical genomics expands the morbid genome of intellectual disability and offers a high diagnostic yield

Intellectual disability (ID) is a measurable phenotypic consequence of genetic and environmental factors. In this study, we prospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of genomic tools (molecular karyotyping, multi-gene panel and exome sequencing) in a cohort of 337 ID subjects as a first-tier test...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular psychiatry 2017-04, Vol.22 (4), p.615-624
Hauptverfasser: Anazi, S, Maddirevula, S, Faqeih, E, Alsedairy, H, Alzahrani, F, Shamseldin, H E, Patel, N, Hashem, M, Ibrahim, N, Abdulwahab, F, Ewida, N, Alsaif, H S, Al sharif, H, Alamoudi, W, Kentab, A, Bashiri, F A, Alnaser, M, AlWadei, A H, Alfadhel, M, Eyaid, W, Hashem, A, Al Asmari, A, Saleh, M M, AlSaman, A, Alhasan, K A, Alsughayir, M, Al Shammari, M, Mahmoud, A, Al-Hassnan, Z N, Al-Husain, M, Osama Khalil, R, Abd El.Meguid, N, Masri, A, Ali, R, Ben-Omran, T, El.Fishway, P, Hashish, A, Ercan Sencicek, A, State, M, Alazami, A M, Salih, M A, Altassan, N, Arold, S T, Abouelhoda, M, Wakil, S M, Monies, D, Shaheen, R, Alkuraya, F S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intellectual disability (ID) is a measurable phenotypic consequence of genetic and environmental factors. In this study, we prospectively assessed the diagnostic yield of genomic tools (molecular karyotyping, multi-gene panel and exome sequencing) in a cohort of 337 ID subjects as a first-tier test and compared it with a standard clinical evaluation performed in parallel. Standard clinical evaluation suggested a diagnosis in 16% of cases (54/337) but only 70% of these (38/54) were subsequently confirmed. On the other hand, the genomic approach revealed a likely diagnosis in 58% ( n =196). These included copy number variants in 14% ( n =54, 15% are novel), and point mutations revealed by multi-gene panel and exome sequencing in the remaining 43% (1% were found to have Fragile-X). The identified point mutations were mostly recessive ( n =117, 81%), consistent with the high consanguinity of the study cohort, but also X-linked ( n =8, 6%) and de novo dominant ( n =19, 13%). When applied directly on all cases with negative molecular karyotyping, the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing was 60% (77/129). Exome sequencing also identified likely pathogenic variants in three novel candidate genes ( DENND5A , NEMF and DNHD1 ) each of which harbored independent homozygous mutations in patients with overlapping phenotypes. In addition, exome sequencing revealed de novo and recessive variants in 32 genes ( MAMDC2, TUBAL3, CPNE6, KLHL24, USP2, PIP5K1A, UBE4A, TP53TG5, ATOH1, C16ORF90, SLC39A14, TRERF1, RGL1, CDH11, SYDE2, HIRA, FEZF2, PROCA1, PIANP, PLK2, QRFPR, AP3B2, NUDT2, UFC1, BTN3A2, TADA1, ARFGEF3 , FAM160B1 , ZMYM5 , SLC45A1 , ARHGAP33 and CAPS2 ), which we highlight as potential candidates on the basis of several lines of evidence, and one of these genes ( SLC39A14 ) was biallelically inactivated in a potentially treatable form of hypermanganesemia and neurodegeneration. Finally, likely causal variants in previously published candidate genes were identified ( ASTN1, HELZ , THOC6 , WDR45B, ADRA2B and CLIP1 ), thus supporting their involvement in ID pathogenesis. Our results expand the morbid genome of ID and support the adoption of genomics as a first-tier test for individuals with ID.
ISSN:1359-4184
1476-5578
DOI:10.1038/mp.2016.113