Does behaviour play a role in house fly resistance to imidacloprid-containing baits?

The objective of this research was to examine the role and type of behavioural mechanisms that function in house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), resistance to an imidacloprid‐containing commercial fly bait, QuickBayt®, using an insecticide‐susceptible and an imidacloprid‐resistant strain. Mortality and feeding behaviour were observed through choice bioassays of three post‐imidacloprid selected house fly generations to determine whether flies would consume the bait in the presence of an alternative food source. Mortality rates in choice containers progressively decreased in post‐selection flies as QuickBayt® no‐choice selections proceeded. There were no differences between the proportions of flies observed contacting QuickBayt® and sugar, respectively, a finding that eliminates repellency as a mechanism of stimulus‐dependent behavioural resistance. However, differences in QuickBayt® consumption and subsequent mortality between choice and no‐choice containers provided strong support for the evolution of consumption irritancy‐ or taste aversion‐related behavioural resistance. The results of this study support the responsible rotation of insecticide bait formulations for house fly control.