Association between quantitative measures obtained using fluorescence‐based methods and activity status of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars

Background Fluorescence‐based methods (FBM) can add objectiveness to diagnosis strategy for caries. Few studies, however, have focused on the evaluation of caries activity. Aim To evaluate the association between quantitative measures obtained with FBM, clinical parameters acquired from the patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of paediatric dentistry 2017-05, Vol.27 (3), p.154-162
Hauptverfasser: Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes, Reyes, Alessandra, Matos, Ronilza, Antunes‐Pontes, Laura Regina, Marques, Renata Pereira de Samuel, Braga, Mariana Minatel, Diniz, Michele Baffi, Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Fluorescence‐based methods (FBM) can add objectiveness to diagnosis strategy for caries. Few studies, however, have focused on the evaluation of caries activity. Aim To evaluate the association between quantitative measures obtained with FBM, clinical parameters acquired from the patients, caries detection, and assessment of activity status in occlusal surfaces of primary molars. Design Six hundred and six teeth from 113 children (4–14 years) were evaluated. The presence of a biofilm, caries experience, and the number of active lesions were recorded. The teeth were assessed using FBM: DIAGNOdent pen (Lfpen) and Quantitative light‐induced fluorescence (QLF). As reference standard, all teeth were evaluated using the ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) associated with clinical activity assessments. Multilevel regressions compared the FBM values and evaluated the association between the FBM measures and clinical variables related to the caries activity. Results The measures from the FBM were higher in cavitated lesions. Only, ∆F values distinguished active and inactive lesions. The LFpen measures were higher in active lesions, at the cavitated threshold (56.95 ± 29.60). Following regression analyses, only the presence of visible biofilm on occlusal surfaces (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.43) and ∆R values of the teeth (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.02) were associated with caries activity. Conclusion Some quantitative measures from FBM parameters are associated with caries activity evaluation, which is similar to the clinical evaluation of the presence of visible biofilm.
ISSN:0960-7439
1365-263X
DOI:10.1111/ipd.12242