Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures

Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric urology 2017-10, Vol.13 (5), p.507.e1-507.e7
Hauptverfasser: Wang, H.-H.S, Tejwani, R, Wolf, S, Wiener, J.S, Routh, J.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 507.e7
container_issue 5
container_start_page 507.e1
container_title Journal of pediatric urology
container_volume 13
creator Wang, H.-H.S
Tejwani, R
Wolf, S
Wiener, J.S
Routh, J.C
description Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using GEE to adjust for hospital-level clustering. Results The study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891455211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1477513117301511</els_id><sourcerecordid>1891455211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a6bc5dff476117960fe5b112fed8eb930e3c5f41c4f0d8892e689352b37bc32d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBghlyYIEjx0nzgYJVbQgVUKisLYce1w5JM7FPxX37evoFhZsWNkanZkz55uqeg2kBQL9-7mdDzlsS0sJDC1hbSk-qc5BDKzpxCieln83DA0HBmfVixhnQthA6Pi8OqOiY13P-Hk1f0NlVhej23x8V2d_WJT3aGpcMdyh18c6bNta37voUhEob-qYw53TaqkDpoAqrehTHVTCWCubMBRRck1Au-Tf9SFsGk0OGF9Wz6xaIr56fC-qH1efvl9-bm6-Xn-5_HjT6LJSalQ_aW6s7YYeYBh7YpFPANSiETiNjCDT3HagO0uMECPFXoyM04kNk2bUsIvq7Wlusf6VMSZZ8mlcSjDccpQgRug4pwBF2p2kOmwxlo3lIbhVhaMEInfKcpYnynKnLAmTpVja3jw65GlF87fpD9Yi-HASYMl57zDIqF2BicYF1Emazf3P4d8BenF-h_4TjxjnLQdfGEqQkUoib_dL74eGgRHgJdkD2_OnOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891455211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wang, H.-H.S ; Tejwani, R ; Wolf, S ; Wiener, J.S ; Routh, J.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, H.-H.S ; Tejwani, R ; Wolf, S ; Wiener, J.S ; Routh, J.C</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using GEE to adjust for hospital-level clustering. Results The study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P <0.001), male (30 vs 20%, P <0.001), and publicly insured (34 vs 29%, P <0.001). Compared with EI, UNC patients had lower rates of additional anti-reflux procedures within 12 months (25 (1.0) vs 121 (6.1%), P <0.001), but a higher rate of 30-day and 90-day readmissions and ER visits. On multivariate analysis, patients treated by UNC remained at higher odds of being readmitted (OR=4.45; 2.69 in 30 days; 90 days, P <0.001) and to have postoperative ER visits (OR=3.33; 2.26 in 30 days; 90 days, P <0.001); however, EI had significantly higher odds of repeat anti-reflux procedures in the subsequent year (OR=7.12, P <0.001). Discussions Endoscopic injection constituted nearly half of initial anti-reflux procedures in children. However, patients treated with UNC had significantly lower odds of requiring re-treatment in the first year relative to those treated with EI. By contrast, patients treated with UNC had more than twice the odds of being readmitted or visiting an ER postoperatively. Although the available data were amongst the largest and most well validated, the major limitation was the retrospective nature of the administrative database. The practice setting may not be generalizable to states not included in the analysis. Conclusions Postoperative readmissions and ER visits were uncommon after any surgical intervention for VUR, but were more common among children undergoing UNC. The EI patients had a more than seven-fold increased risk of surgical re-treatment within 1 year.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-5131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28434635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Complication ; Pediatrics ; Surgery ; Urology ; Vesicoureteral reflux</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric urology, 2017-10, Vol.13 (5), p.507.e1-507.e7</ispartof><rights>Journal of Pediatric Urology Company</rights><rights>2017 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a6bc5dff476117960fe5b112fed8eb930e3c5f41c4f0d8892e689352b37bc32d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a6bc5dff476117960fe5b112fed8eb930e3c5f41c4f0d8892e689352b37bc32d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7731-963X ; 0000-0002-9353-3644</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477513117301511$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28434635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, H.-H.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejwani, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routh, J.C</creatorcontrib><title>Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures</title><title>Journal of pediatric urology</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Urol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using GEE to adjust for hospital-level clustering. Results The study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P <0.001), male (30 vs 20%, P <0.001), and publicly insured (34 vs 29%, P <0.001). Compared with EI, UNC patients had lower rates of additional anti-reflux procedures within 12 months (25 (1.0) vs 121 (6.1%), P <0.001), but a higher rate of 30-day and 90-day readmissions and ER visits. On multivariate analysis, patients treated by UNC remained at higher odds of being readmitted (OR=4.45; 2.69 in 30 days; 90 days, P <0.001) and to have postoperative ER visits (OR=3.33; 2.26 in 30 days; 90 days, P <0.001); however, EI had significantly higher odds of repeat anti-reflux procedures in the subsequent year (OR=7.12, P <0.001). Discussions Endoscopic injection constituted nearly half of initial anti-reflux procedures in children. However, patients treated with UNC had significantly lower odds of requiring re-treatment in the first year relative to those treated with EI. By contrast, patients treated with UNC had more than twice the odds of being readmitted or visiting an ER postoperatively. Although the available data were amongst the largest and most well validated, the major limitation was the retrospective nature of the administrative database. The practice setting may not be generalizable to states not included in the analysis. Conclusions Postoperative readmissions and ER visits were uncommon after any surgical intervention for VUR, but were more common among children undergoing UNC. The EI patients had a more than seven-fold increased risk of surgical re-treatment within 1 year.]]></description><subject>Complication</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Vesicoureteral reflux</subject><issn>1477-5131</issn><issn>1873-4898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwBghlyYIEjx0nzgYJVbQgVUKisLYce1w5JM7FPxX37evoFhZsWNkanZkz55uqeg2kBQL9-7mdDzlsS0sJDC1hbSk-qc5BDKzpxCieln83DA0HBmfVixhnQthA6Pi8OqOiY13P-Hk1f0NlVhej23x8V2d_WJT3aGpcMdyh18c6bNta37voUhEob-qYw53TaqkDpoAqrehTHVTCWCubMBRRck1Au-Tf9SFsGk0OGF9Wz6xaIr56fC-qH1efvl9-bm6-Xn-5_HjT6LJSalQ_aW6s7YYeYBh7YpFPANSiETiNjCDT3HagO0uMECPFXoyM04kNk2bUsIvq7Wlusf6VMSZZ8mlcSjDccpQgRug4pwBF2p2kOmwxlo3lIbhVhaMEInfKcpYnynKnLAmTpVja3jw65GlF87fpD9Yi-HASYMl57zDIqF2BicYF1Emazf3P4d8BenF-h_4TjxjnLQdfGEqQkUoib_dL74eGgRHgJdkD2_OnOQ</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Wang, H.-H.S</creator><creator>Tejwani, R</creator><creator>Wolf, S</creator><creator>Wiener, J.S</creator><creator>Routh, J.C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-963X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-3644</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures</title><author>Wang, H.-H.S ; Tejwani, R ; Wolf, S ; Wiener, J.S ; Routh, J.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-a6bc5dff476117960fe5b112fed8eb930e3c5f41c4f0d8892e689352b37bc32d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Complication</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Vesicoureteral reflux</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, H.-H.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejwani, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routh, J.C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, H.-H.S</au><au>Tejwani, R</au><au>Wolf, S</au><au>Wiener, J.S</au><au>Routh, J.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric urology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Urol</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>507.e1</spage><epage>507.e7</epage><pages>507.e1-507.e7</pages><issn>1477-5131</issn><eissn>1873-4898</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using GEE to adjust for hospital-level clustering. Results The study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P <0.001), male (30 vs 20%, P <0.001), and publicly insured (34 vs 29%, P <0.001). Compared with EI, UNC patients had lower rates of additional anti-reflux procedures within 12 months (25 (1.0) vs 121 (6.1%), P <0.001), but a higher rate of 30-day and 90-day readmissions and ER visits. On multivariate analysis, patients treated by UNC remained at higher odds of being readmitted (OR=4.45; 2.69 in 30 days; 90 days, P <0.001) and to have postoperative ER visits (OR=3.33; 2.26 in 30 days; 90 days, P <0.001); however, EI had significantly higher odds of repeat anti-reflux procedures in the subsequent year (OR=7.12, P <0.001). Discussions Endoscopic injection constituted nearly half of initial anti-reflux procedures in children. However, patients treated with UNC had significantly lower odds of requiring re-treatment in the first year relative to those treated with EI. By contrast, patients treated with UNC had more than twice the odds of being readmitted or visiting an ER postoperatively. Although the available data were amongst the largest and most well validated, the major limitation was the retrospective nature of the administrative database. The practice setting may not be generalizable to states not included in the analysis. Conclusions Postoperative readmissions and ER visits were uncommon after any surgical intervention for VUR, but were more common among children undergoing UNC. The EI patients had a more than seven-fold increased risk of surgical re-treatment within 1 year.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28434635</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.016</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-963X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-3644</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-5131
ispartof Journal of pediatric urology, 2017-10, Vol.13 (5), p.507.e1-507.e7
issn 1477-5131
1873-4898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891455211
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Complication
Pediatrics
Surgery
Urology
Vesicoureteral reflux
title Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Readmissions,%20unplanned%20emergency%20room%20visits,%20and%20surgical%20retreatment%20rates%20after%20anti-reflux%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20urology&rft.au=Wang,%20H.-H.S&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=507.e1&rft.epage=507.e7&rft.pages=507.e1-507.e7&rft.issn=1477-5131&rft.eissn=1873-4898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891455211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891455211&rft_id=info:pmid/28434635&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1477513117301511&rfr_iscdi=true