Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures
Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID),...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric urology 2017-10, Vol.13 (5), p.507.e1-507.e7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary Introduction /Background: The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial. Objective To compare postoperative outcomes of EI versus UNC. Study design This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using GEE to adjust for hospital-level clustering. Results The study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-5131 1873-4898 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.016 |