Common Carotid Artery Sonography Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Cardiac Output Measurements in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Objectives This study was designed to test the effectiveness of common carotid artery sonography in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for cardiac output measurements to provide an easier alternative for cardiac output monitoring in the intensive care unit. Methods This study inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2017-09, Vol.36 (9), p.1793-1799
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Qian‐Yi, Zhang, Li‐Na, Ai, Mei‐Lin, Li, Li, Hu, Cheng‐Huan, Zhang, Yan‐Xin, Liu, Wei, Feng, Qing, Zou, Yu, Ai, Yu‐Hang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives This study was designed to test the effectiveness of common carotid artery sonography in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for cardiac output measurements to provide an easier alternative for cardiac output monitoring in the intensive care unit. Methods This study included 148 patients who had common carotid artery Doppler examinations and TTE performed within 8 hours of each other, and the cardiac output measurement results were compared with each other. Results The mean age of the participants ± SD was 56.8 ± 16.2 years, with male patients composing 54.7% of the cohort. There was no significant difference in carotid and TTE cardiac output between different sexes, age groups, patients with and without mechanical ventilation, and primary indication groups. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient between the carotid and TTE cardiac output was 0.537. In patients with septic shock, multiple trauma, and respiratory failure, the intraclass correlation coefficients between TTE and carotid cardiac output were 0.241, 0.061, and 0.095, respectively. Conclusions Carotid cardiac output shows moderate agreement with TTE cardiac output; thus, its use may be considered as an alternative for estimating cardiac output in emergencies and when TTE cardiac output is unobtainable. However, in patients with septic shock, multiple trauma, and respiratory failure, the use of carotid cardiac output is not recommended.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.14214