Routine post-operative esophagram is not necessary after repair of esophageal atresia

Abstract Introduction Esophagrams are routinely performed following repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF); however, its utility has not been validated. Methods EA/TEF repair performed from 2003-2014 at a single pediatric hospital and from 2004-2014 in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2017-04, Vol.213 (4), p.640-644
Hauptverfasser: Golden, Jamie, Demeter, Natalie E, Lim, Joanna, Ford, Henri R, Upperman, Jeffrey S, Gayer, Christopher P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Esophagrams are routinely performed following repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF); however, its utility has not been validated. Methods EA/TEF repair performed from 2003-2014 at a single pediatric hospital and from 2004-2014 in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database were retrospectively reviewed to determine utility of esophagrams. Results Esophagram was performed in 99% of patients at our institution (N = 105). Clinical signs were seen prior to esophagram in patients whose leak changed clinical management. Esophagram on post-operative day ≤15 was performed in 66% of PHIS database patients (N = 3255). Esophagram did not change the incidence of chest tube placement, reoperation, or dilation. Patients who required a reoperation were less likely to have an esophagram than patients who did not require a reoperation (40.7% versus 65.7%, p 
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.020