Routine post-operative esophagram is not necessary after repair of esophageal atresia
Abstract Introduction Esophagrams are routinely performed following repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF); however, its utility has not been validated. Methods EA/TEF repair performed from 2003-2014 at a single pediatric hospital and from 2004-2014 in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2017-04, Vol.213 (4), p.640-644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Introduction Esophagrams are routinely performed following repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF); however, its utility has not been validated. Methods EA/TEF repair performed from 2003-2014 at a single pediatric hospital and from 2004-2014 in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database were retrospectively reviewed to determine utility of esophagrams. Results Esophagram was performed in 99% of patients at our institution (N = 105). Clinical signs were seen prior to esophagram in patients whose leak changed clinical management. Esophagram on post-operative day ≤15 was performed in 66% of PHIS database patients (N = 3255). Esophagram did not change the incidence of chest tube placement, reoperation, or dilation. Patients who required a reoperation were less likely to have an esophagram than patients who did not require a reoperation (40.7% versus 65.7%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.12.020 |