Origin of the Lengshuigou porphyry–skarn Cu deposit in the Zha-Shan district, South Qinling, central China, and implications for differences between porphyry Cu and Mo deposits

Porphyry Cu and Mo deposits are two economically important types of metal deposits worldwide, but factors controlling their difference remain enigmatic. Compared with the well-studied large porphyry Mo province in the south margin of the North China Block (S-NCB), the origin of newly discovered porphyry Cu deposits in the South Qinling (SQB) is poorly constrained. Integrated zircon LA–ICPMS U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os ages and geological evidence indicate three stages of magmatism at Lengshuigou: (1) late Neoproterozoic (718 to 704 Ma) quartz diorite + albitite + granite association during the pre-ore stage, (2) 146 to 145 Ma granodiorite porphyry during the syn-ore stage, and (3) 145 Ma granite porphyry during the post-ore stage. Elemental and Sr–Nd isotopic evidence provide important constraints on their magma source. Pre-ore Neoproterozoic quartz diorite + albitite + granite was derived by re-melting of a mixture of crustal and juvenile mantle materials, and stronger fractional crystallization was involved in these ore-hosting intrusions than in contemporary granitoids hosted in the Douling Group. Syn-ore granodiorite porphyry was derived from mantle-derived magma with contributions from different proportions of crustal components. Post-ore granite porphyry was derived mainly from a crustal source. Nearly contemporaneous porphyry Cu and Mo systems were identified in Qinling Province, including the 147–139 Ma porphyry Mo systems in the S-NCB and 150–146 Ma porphyry Cu systems in the SQB. Granitic stocks related to porphyry Cu systems in the SQB are characterized by moderate SiO 2 contents (58.01–69.07 %) and less radiogenic Nd–Hf isotopes (εNd (t) = −3.8 to −6.3, εHf (t) = −4.5 to +1.6), whereas the granitic stocks related to porphyry Mo deposits in the S-NCB have high SiO 2 concentrations (64.00–76.00 %) and more radiogenic Nd–Hf isotopes (εNd (t) = −18.0 to −11.6, εHf (t) = −26.3 to −13.5). In addition, molybdenite from the Chigou and Lengshuigou porphyry Cu deposits in the S-NCB show higher Re contents (77.50–394.3 ppm) than those from nearly contemporaneous porphyry Mo deposits (9.34–49.7 ppm) in the S-NCB. These lines of evidence indicate that a higher proportion of mantle component was involved in the formation of porphyry Cu deposits in the SQB than nearly contemporaneous porphyry Mo deposits in the S-NCB. It is most likely that the nature of the magma source plays an essential role in the differences between porphyry Cu and Mo deposits.