Impacts of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration patterns on downscaling soil moisture in regions with large topographic relief
Soil moisture can be estimated at coarse resolutions (>1 km) using satellite remote sensing, but that resolution is poorly suited for many applications. The Equilibrium Moisture from Topography, Vegetation, and Soil (EMT+VS) model downscales coarse‐resolution soil moisture using fine‐resolution t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2017-02, Vol.53 (2), p.1553-1574 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Soil moisture can be estimated at coarse resolutions (>1 km) using satellite remote sensing, but that resolution is poorly suited for many applications. The Equilibrium Moisture from Topography, Vegetation, and Soil (EMT+VS) model downscales coarse‐resolution soil moisture using fine‐resolution topographic, vegetation, and soil data to produce fine‐resolution (10–30 m) estimates of soil moisture. The EMT+VS model performs well at catchments with low topographic relief (≤124 m), but it has not been applied to regions with larger ranges of elevation. Large relief can produce substantial variations in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET), which might affect the fine‐resolution patterns of soil moisture. In this research, simple methods to downscale temporal average precipitation and PET are developed and included in the EMT+VS model, and the effects of spatial variations in these variables on the surface soil moisture estimates are investigated. The methods are tested against ground truth data at the 239 km2 Reynolds Creek watershed in southern Idaho, which has 1145 m of relief. The precipitation and PET downscaling methods are able to capture the main features in the spatial patterns of both variables. The space‐time Nash‐Sutcliffe coefficients of efficiency of the fine‐resolution soil moisture estimates improve from 0.33 to 0.36 and 0.41 when the precipitation and PET downscaling methods are included, respectively. PET downscaling provides a larger improvement in the soil moisture estimates than precipitation downscaling likely because the PET pattern is more persistent through time, and thus more predictable, than the precipitation pattern.
Key Points
Simple elevation‐based downscaling methods for average precipitation and potential evapotranspiration are proposed
Much of the spatial variability in average precipitation and PET is captured for the Reynolds Creek watershed
Spatial variations in precipitation and PET affect soil moisture patterns and improve soil moisture downscaling |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2016WR019907 |