Blood–brain barrier breakdown in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: Implications for pathophysiology and diagnosis

Objective Diagnosis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is currently based on luminographic findings of vasoconstriction. In addition to vasoconstriction, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown has been postulated as a central mechanism of RCVS. Our aim was to document BBB break...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of neurology 2017-03, Vol.81 (3), p.454-466
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Mi Ji, Cha, Jihoon, Choi, Hyun Ah, Woo, Sook‐Young, Kim, Seonwoo, Wang, Shuu‐Jiun, Chung, Chin‐Sang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Diagnosis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is currently based on luminographic findings of vasoconstriction. In addition to vasoconstriction, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown has been postulated as a central mechanism of RCVS. Our aim was to document BBB breakdown in patients with RCVS and its role for the pathophysiology‐based diagnosis of RCVS. Methods We prospectively recruited 72 consecutive patients with thunderclap headache who did not have aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage from April 2015 to July 2016 at the Samsung Medical Center. Based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders–3 beta criteria and neuroimaging, patients were classified as having RCVS (n = 41; “definite” in 29 imaging‐proven patients and “probable” in 12 imaging‐negative patients), other secondary causes (n = 7), and thunderclap headache of undetermined cause (n = 24). BBB breakdown was evaluated using contrast‐enhanced fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging. Results BBB breakdown was documented in 20 (69.0%) patients with definite RCVS, 3 (25.0%) patients with probable RCVS, and none with other secondary causes. BBB breakdown was present in RCVS patients with (n = 4) and without (n = 19) concomitant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. In patients with RCVS, the extent of BBB breakdown was independently associated with neurological complications (multivariate odds ratio = 1.48 per 1 territorial increase, 95% confidence interval = 1.04–2.12, adjusted p = 0.032). Three (12.5%) patients with thunderclap headache of undetermined cause were newly classified as having RCVS by the presence of BBB breakdown. Interpretation This is the first study to show BBB breakdown in patients with RCVS. This finding might broaden our understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical spectrum of RCVS. Ann Neurol 2017;81:454–466
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/ana.24891