Does timing of gastroschisis repair matter? A comparison using the ACS NSQIP Pediatric database

Abstract Background There is no consensus on optimal timing of gastroschisis repair. The 2012–2014 ACS NSQIP Pediatric Participant Use Data File was used to compare outcomes of primary versus staged gastroschisis repair. Methods Cases were divided into primary repair (0–1 day) and staged repair (4–14 days). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared for primary versus staged closure using fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon ranksum tests for continuous variables. Length of stay was compared after controlling for prematurity. Results There were 627 subjects included, with 364 neonates in the primary group and 263 in the staged group. The primary group demonstrated shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (5.1 days;p < 0.001) and had less surgical site infections (OR = 0.27;p = 0.003), but had longer ventilator days (1.9 days;p < 0.001). Neonates in the primary repair group were less likely to be discharged home versus transferred to another hospital (OR = 0.24; p = 0.006) and more likely to require nutritional support at discharge (OR = 1.74; p = 0.034). No significant differences were identified for mortality, readmissions, postoperative LOS, sepsis or other outcomes. Conclusion Staged repair of gastroschisis has longer LOS attributed to preoperative timing, but less ventilator days. Outcomes for these closure techniques are equivocal and support surgeons performing the closure technique they are most experienced with. Level of Evidence: III (Treatment: retrospective comparative study).