Local diffusion and diffusion-T2 distribution measurements in porous media

[Display omitted] •Slice-selective PFG and PFG-T2 measurements are developed.•A spatially selective adiabatic inversion pulse was employed for slice-selection.•A coarse slice, on the order of 1cm, at an arbitrary position can be selected.•The new method can be employed to characterize oil-water mixt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance (1997) 2017-05, Vol.278, p.104-112
Hauptverfasser: Vashaee, S., Newling, B., MacMillan, B., Marica, F., Li, M., Balcom, B.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Slice-selective PFG and PFG-T2 measurements are developed.•A spatially selective adiabatic inversion pulse was employed for slice-selection.•A coarse slice, on the order of 1cm, at an arbitrary position can be selected.•The new method can be employed to characterize oil-water mixtures. Slice-selective pulsed field gradient (PFG) and PFG-T2 measurements are developed to measure spatially-resolved molecular diffusion and diffusion-T2 distributions. A spatially selective adiabatic inversion pulse was employed for slice-selection. The slice-selective pulse is able to select a coarse slice, on the order of 1cm, at an arbitrary position in the sample. The new method can be employed to characterize oil-water mixtures in porous media. The new technique has an inherent sensitivity advantage over phase encoding imaging based methods due to signal being localized from a thick slice. The method will be advantageous for magnetic resonance of porous media at low field where sensitivity is problematic. Experimental CPMG data, following PFG diffusion measurement, were compromised by a transient ΔB0(t) field offset. The off resonance effects of ΔB0(t) were examined by simulation. The ΔB0 offset artifact in D-T2 distribution measurements may be avoided by employing real data, instead of magnitude data.
ISSN:1090-7807
1096-0856
DOI:10.1016/j.jmr.2017.03.014