Postoperative changes after surgical mesh hernia repair: a pitfall in interpretation of 18F-FDG PET-CT

Objective A number of case reports have demonstrated FDG uptake around mesh prostheses after hernia repair surgery. This study characterizes FDG PET-CT findings after hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a series of cancer patients. Materials and methods FDG PET-CT studies were reviewed for increase...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 2017-08, Vol.21 (4), p.629-636
Hauptverfasser: Davidson, T., Klang, E., Goshen, E., Goldstein, J., Khaikin, M., Chikman, B., Ben-Haim, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective A number of case reports have demonstrated FDG uptake around mesh prostheses after hernia repair surgery. This study characterizes FDG PET-CT findings after hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a series of cancer patients. Materials and methods FDG PET-CT studies were reviewed for increased FDG uptake consistent with CT appearances of post-surgical hernia repair in cancer patients. The findings were correlated with clinical data and follow-up studies. Results 53 PET-CT studies in 22 patients (18 males, 31–79 years) were identified. Surgery for repair of inguinal ( n   =  14), ventral ( n   =  5) or umbilical ( n   =  3) hernia was performed, 4–204 months prior to PET-CT. FDG avidity was focal or linear in the region of the anterior abdominal or pelvic wall (mean SUV max 4.0 ± 2.3). Corresponding nonspecific CT findings included soft tissue thickening ( n   =  18), fat infiltration ( n   =  20) and fluid collection ( n   =  19) in the region of the omentum, adjacent to or in the inner abdominal or pelvic wall at the surgical site. Linear hyper-dense structures ( n   =  9) or metallic clips ( n   =  8) seen on CT suggested benign postoperative changes. In 10/12 (83.3%) patients with repeat PET-CT, FDG uptake remained unchanged, one showed more diffuse uptake and another showed reduced uptake on follow-up. There was neither significant change in CT appearance at the surgical site in these 12 patients, nor in 3 additional patients with only CT follow-up. Another 3 patients had previous CT demonstrating hernia at the same location. Conclusion With increasing use of synthetic mesh, awareness of variations in FDG PET-CT appearance is important to avoid false interpretation in cancer patients.
ISSN:1265-4906
1248-9204
DOI:10.1007/s10029-017-1596-9