Two-Year Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

In a follow-up of a trial comparing endovascular thrombectomy with conventional therapy for acute ischemic stroke, the beneficial effect on functional recovery that was observed at 90 days was maintained at 2 years. Quality of life was better at 2 years with endovascular treatment. We reported previ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2017-04, Vol.376 (14), p.1341-1349
Hauptverfasser: van den Berg, Lucie A, Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.W, Berkhemer, Olvert A, Fransen, Puck S.S, Beumer, Debbie, Lingsma, Hester F, Majoie, Charles B.L.M, Dippel, Diederik W.J, van der Lugt, Aad, van Oostenbrugge, Robert J, van Zwam, Wim H, Roos, Yvo B.W.E.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a follow-up of a trial comparing endovascular thrombectomy with conventional therapy for acute ischemic stroke, the beneficial effect on functional recovery that was observed at 90 days was maintained at 2 years. Quality of life was better at 2 years with endovascular treatment. We reported previously the 90-day outcomes of a trial (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands [MR CLEAN]) in which standard treatment was compared with endovascular treatment, administered within 6 hours after the onset of acute ischemic stroke caused by an intracranial arterial occlusion of the anterior circulation. 1 Most patients in the intervention group were treated by mechanical thrombectomy with the use of retrievable stents. The trial showed that functional recovery at 90 days was better with the intervention than with standard treatment. Subsequently, the beneficial effect of mechanical thrombectomy on 90-day outcomes . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1612136