Contrast‐induced nephropathy in patients undergoing endovascular peripheral vascular intervention: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes as observed in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium

Background The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with Contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN) after Percutaneous Vascular Intervention (PVI) in contemporary medical practice are largely unknown. Methods A total of 13 126 patients undergoing PVI were included in the analysis. CIN was define...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiology 2017-06, Vol.30 (3), p.274-280
Hauptverfasser: Grossman, P. Michael, Ali, Syed S., Aronow, Herbert D., Boros, Michael, Nypaver, Timothy J., Schreiber, Theodore L., Park, Yeo Jung, Henke, Peter K., Gurm, Hitinder S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with Contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN) after Percutaneous Vascular Intervention (PVI) in contemporary medical practice are largely unknown. Methods A total of 13 126 patients undergoing PVI were included in the analysis. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine from pre‐PVI baseline to post‐PVI peak Cr of ≥0.5 mg/dL. Results CIN occurred in 3% (400 patients) of the cohort, and 26 patients (6.5%) required dialysis. Independent predictors of CIN were high and low body weight, diabetes, heart failure, anemia, baseline renal dysfunction, critical limb ischemia, and a higher acuity of the PVI procedure and a contrast dose that was greater than three times the calculated creatinine clearance (CCC) (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1‐1.8, P = 0.003). CIN was strongly associated with adverse outcome including in‐hospital death (adjusted OR 18.1, CI 10.7‐30.6, P 
ISSN:0896-4327
1540-8183
DOI:10.1111/joic.12379