A prospective study of elderly initiating mirabegron versus antimuscarinics: Patient reported outcomes from the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Scales and other instruments
Aims To understand differences in patient reported outcomes (PRO) between patients initiating mirabegron or an antimuscarinic using a validated PRO instrument, OAB‐Satisfaction (OAB‐S). Methods This prospective observational study used real‐time prescription claims from Humana to identify Medicare p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2018-01, Vol.37 (1), p.177-185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims
To understand differences in patient reported outcomes (PRO) between patients initiating mirabegron or an antimuscarinic using a validated PRO instrument, OAB‐Satisfaction (OAB‐S).
Methods
This prospective observational study used real‐time prescription claims from Humana to identify Medicare patients initiating mirabegron or an antimuscarinic to participate in a series of three phone surveys over ninety days.
Results
A total of 1897 mirabegron and 2444 randomly selected antimuscarinic initiators were identified; 174 mirabegron and 193 antimuscarinic initiators completed all three surveys. Among responders, mirabegron initiators were slightly older (76 vs 75 years, P = 0.032), included more males (32% vs 23%, P = 0.044), more likely to have prior OAB treatment (21% vs 13%, P = 0.048), and had greater medication burden (number of unique medications: 10.0 vs 8.7, P = 0.014). There were no between‐group differences at any time or on any OAB‐S scale. There were significant within‐group differences at follow‐up compared to baseline for OAB‐S scales: “impact on daily living,” with improvement over the 90‐day survey period for both mirabegron (P = 0.008) and antimuscarinic (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
DOI: | 10.1002/nau.23271 |