Patient Preferences for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment
Background Pain from advanced cancer remains prevalent, severe and often under-treated. Aim The aim of this study was to conduct a discrete choice experiment with patients to understand their preferences for pain management services and inform service development. Methods Focus groups were used to d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The patient : patient-centered outcomes research 2017-10, Vol.10 (5), p.643-651 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Pain from advanced cancer remains prevalent, severe and often under-treated.
Aim
The aim of this study was to conduct a discrete choice experiment with patients to understand their preferences for pain management services and inform service development.
Methods
Focus groups were used to develop the attributes and levels of the discrete choice experiment. The attributes were:
waiting time
,
type of healthcare professional
,
out-of-pocket costs
,
side-effect control
,
quality of communication
,
quality of information
and
pain control
. Patients completed the discrete choice experiment along with clinical and health-related quality of life questions. Conditional and mixed logit models were used to analyse the data.
Results
Patients with cancer pain (
n
= 221) and within palliative care services completed the survey (45% were female, mean age 64.6 years; age range 21–92 years). The most important aspects of pain management were: good pain control, zero out-of-pocket costs and good side-effect control. Poor or moderate pain control and £30 costs drew the highest negative preferences. Respondents preferred control of side effects and provision of better information and communication, over access to certain healthcare professionals. Those with lower health-related quality of life were less willing to wait for treatment and willing to incur higher costs. The presence of a carer influenced preferences.
Conclusions
Outcome attributes were more important than process attributes but the latter were still valued. Thus, supporting self-management, for example by providing better information on pain may be a worthwhile endeavour. However, service provision may need to account for individual characteristics given the heterogeneity in preferences. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1178-1653 1178-1661 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40271-017-0236-x |