Morphometry of the tibial plateau at the surface and resected levels

Abstract Background We aim to make an anthropometric analysis of tibial plateau at the surface level and the resected level and analyze the correlation in lengths between two levels. We hypothesized that lengths at the surface level were longer than those at the resected level, which brought soft ti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2017-08, Vol.32 (8), p.2563-2567
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Yijie, Chen, Yanxi, Qiang, Minfei, Zhang, Kun, Li, Haobo, Jiang, Yuchen, Jia, Xiaoyang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background We aim to make an anthropometric analysis of tibial plateau at the surface level and the resected level and analyze the correlation in lengths between two levels. We hypothesized that lengths at the surface level were longer than those at the resected level, which brought soft tissue tolerance for tibial component to overhang. Methods Anthropometric data were measured using three dimensional (3D) structures reconstructed from tibial plateaus of 100 knees in 100 Chinese subjects (50 men and 50 women). Mediolateral (ML), medial anteroposterior (MAP) and lateral anteroposterior (LAP) lengths at the surface level and the resected level were measured, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficients of these data were calculated. Results ML, MAP lengths at the surface level were longer than those at the resected level by a mean 2.38 ± 1.29 mm and 1.99 ± 1.76 mm, respectively. LAP length at the surface level was shorter than that at the resected level by a mean 1.54 ± 2.49 mm. All these differences between two levels had no gender difference. Conclusion Our findings suggest that tibial overhang could be better tolerated in the medial compared to the lateral compartment but this hypothesis has to be further investigated in a clinical study.
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.078