‘Mendelian randomization’: an approach for exploring causal relations in epidemiology
Abstract Objectives To assess the current status of Mendelian randomization (MR) approach in effectively influencing the observational epidemiology for examining causal relationships. Methods Narrative review on studies related to principle, strengths, limitations, and achievements of MR approach. R...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public health (London) 2017-04, Vol.145, p.113-119 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objectives To assess the current status of Mendelian randomization (MR) approach in effectively influencing the observational epidemiology for examining causal relationships. Methods Narrative review on studies related to principle, strengths, limitations, and achievements of MR approach. Results Observational epidemiological studies have repeatedly produced several beneficiary associations which were discarded when tested by standard randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The technique which is more feasible, highly similar to RCTs, and has the potential to establish a causal relationship between modifiable exposures and disease outcomes is known as MR. The technique uses genetic variants related to modifiable traits/exposures as instruments for detecting causal and directional associations with outcomes. Conclusions In the last decade, the approach of MR has methodologically developed and progressed to a stage of high acceptance among the epidemiologists and is gradually expanding the landscape of causal relationships in non-communicable chronic diseases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-3506 1476-5616 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.033 |