MRONJ risk reduction pathway - 360 degree survey
Key Points Preventive dental screening reduces the incidence of MRONJ/BRONJ. A cross-service cross-healthcare boundary preventive pathway was developed. Alternative ways of delivering specialist led MRONJ/BRONJ preventive services can be successful with a robust clinical governance framework. Introd...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British dental journal 2017-03, Vol.222 (5), p.386-390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Key Points
Preventive dental screening reduces the incidence of MRONJ/BRONJ.
A cross-service cross-healthcare boundary preventive pathway was developed.
Alternative ways of delivering specialist led MRONJ/BRONJ preventive services can be successful with a robust clinical governance framework.
Introduction
Bisphosphonates and denosumab reduce the risk of skeletal events in some malignancies (for example, breast, myeloma). These drugs carry a significant risk of a difficult-to-manage side effect of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Preventive dental screening and treatment reduces the incidence of MRONJ. A managed clinical network (MCN) has been used to provide a MRONJ risk reduction pathway. A 360 degree survey was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of the pathway.
Aim
The aim of the 360 degree survey was to evaluate if this preventive pathway fulfilled its aims based on patient and stakeholder responses.
Method
A multidisciplinary, cross-service, cross-health board MRONJ preventive pathway has been developed. A 360 degree feedback survey of patients and other stakeholders was undertaken.
Results
Overall, this survey revealed high levels of satisfaction across patients, oncologists, community dental services, general dental services, and hospital managers.
Conclusion
Alternative ways of delivering MRONJ preventive pathways can be developed and assessed using iterative stakeholder feedback aided by a robust clinical governance framework. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0610 1476-5373 |
DOI: | 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.225 |