Ideal Guiding Catheter Position During Bilaterally Engaged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract Using a novel combined angiography-computed tomography (CT) system, we evaluated the impact of the intra-aortic root position of a right coronary artery (RCA) catheter on its coaxiality. We retrospectively enrolled 19 patients who underwent CT scans during bilaterally engaged percutaneous c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2017-05, Vol.119 (10), p.1518-1524
Hauptverfasser: Yokoi, Kensuke, MD, Hara, Masahiko, MD, PhD, Ueda, Yasunori, MD, PhD, Sumitsuji, Satoru, MD, Awata, Masaki, MD, PhD, Salah, Youssef K., MD, Kabata, Daijiro, PT, Shintani, Ayumi, PhD, MPH, Sakata, Yasushi, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Using a novel combined angiography-computed tomography (CT) system, we evaluated the impact of the intra-aortic root position of a right coronary artery (RCA) catheter on its coaxiality. We retrospectively enrolled 19 patients who underwent CT scans during bilaterally engaged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coaxiality was defined as the angle between the RCA and the RCA catheter. The coaxiality was better when the RCA catheter was placed anterior to the left main coronary artery (LMCA) catheter (median 27.0 vs. 53.7 degrees, p = 0.02). The position of the RCA catheter had a significant impact on the coaxiality of it, with a coaxiality improvement ratio of 0.506 (95% confidence interval 0.294 - 0.871, p = 0.017). Three-dimensional reconstructed CT images of the right anterior oblique (RAO) projection could determine the position of catheters in all cases. In conclusion, the RCA catheter should be placed anterior, rather than posterior, to the LMCA catheter for better coaxiality during bilaterally engaged PCI. The RAO projection is useful for determining the catheter position.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.026