Effect of long-term remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet function and fibrinolysis in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure

Abstract Introduction Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury through cellular protective pathways, but may also modulate haemostasis. We aimed to investigate the effect of long-term RIC on platelet function and fibrinolysis in patients with chronic ischaemi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thrombosis research 2017-05, Vol.153, p.40-46
Hauptverfasser: Pryds, Kasper, Kristiansen, Jacobina, Neergaard-Petersen, Søs, Nielsen, Roni R, Schmidt, Michael R, Refsgaard, Jens, Kristensen, Steen D, Bøtker, Hans Erik, Hvas, Anne-Mette, Grove, Erik L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury through cellular protective pathways, but may also modulate haemostasis. We aimed to investigate the effect of long-term RIC on platelet function and fibrinolysis in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure (CIHF). Material and methods In a prospective, outcome-assessor blinded, paired study, 16 patients with CIHF and 21 age- and gender-matched controls without ischaemic heart disease (IHD) were treated with RIC once daily for 28 ± 4 days. RIC was performed as four cycles of 5 min upper arm ischaemia and reperfusion. We evaluated collagen and arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation (Multiplate®Analyzer), platelet turnover (Sysmex® XE-5000), platelet activation (plasma soluble-platelet-selectin) and fibrinolysis (clot lysis time, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)). We compared blood samples assessed at baseline and following long-term RIC. Results Long-term RIC did not affect platelet aggregation, turnover or activation or PAI-1 in any study groups. Long-term RIC did not affect fibrin clot lysis time in patients with CIHF but reduced fibrin clot lysis time in matched controls without IHD (median: 773 s (interquartile range: 689–936) vs. 658 s (618–823), p = 0.03). t-PA was increased following long-term RIC in CIHF patients (2.5 (1.7–3.4) vs. 2.9 (1.8–4.0), p = 0.03) and in matched controls without IHD (1.5 (1.3–1.9) vs. 1.6 (1.4–2.3), p = 0.03). Conclusions While long-term RIC did not affect collagen or arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation, platelet turnover or sP-selectin, fibrinolysis was increased although most consistently in matched controls without IHD. This finding suggests that RIC may stimulate fibrinolysis potentially reducing the risk of thrombosis.
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2017.03.008