Incomplete partition type III: A rare and difficult cochlear implant surgical indication

Abstract Objective Presenting the clinical features and treatment options for incomplete partition type-III. Methods Nine primary and 1 revision incomplete partition type-III cochlear implant cases treated between 2004 and 2015 in Hacettepe University Department of Otolaryngology were included in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Auris, nasus, larynx nasus, larynx, 2018-02, Vol.45 (1), p.26-32
Hauptverfasser: Sennaroğlu, Levent, Bajin, Münir Demir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective Presenting the clinical features and treatment options for incomplete partition type-III. Methods Nine primary and 1 revision incomplete partition type-III cochlear implant cases treated between 2004 and 2015 in Hacettepe University Department of Otolaryngology were included in the study. Treatment options and particularly cochlear implantation tecnique were described. Results Nine primary and 1 revison cases were all succesfully implanted. Eight cases were standart cases with no secondary intervention. Case #9 has to be revised intraoperatively and case #10 were operated four times in another center and revised in our department. Conclusion Incomplete partition type-III is one of the rarest inner ear anomaly and the rarest among incomplete partition group. Treatment options may differ depending on the hearing loss level of the patient. Stapes surgery should be avoided because it will lead to gusher and further hearing loss. Preoperative imaging is mandatory in order to avoid unnecessary stapes surgery. Incochlear implantation surgery a gusher and misplacement into the IAC may complicate the surgery. Gusher should be controlled intraoperatively and the position of the electrode should be controlled via intraoperative imaging.
ISSN:0385-8146
1879-1476
DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2017.02.006