Chronic total occlusion is associated with a higher incidence of malapposition and uncovered stent struts: OCT findings at 6 months following DES implantation

Objectives To compare stent coverage and malapposition in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions and non‐CTO lesions (including lipid‐rich plaque [LRP] and non‐lipid‐rich plaque [non‐LRP]) after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Background Diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2017-03, Vol.89 (S1), p.582-591
Hauptverfasser: Jia, Haibo, Hu, Sining, Liu, Huimin, Zhu, Yinchun, Zhe, Chun‐yang, Li, Lulu, Mustafina, Irina, Hou, Jingbo, Zhang, Shaosong, Yu, Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To compare stent coverage and malapposition in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions and non‐CTO lesions (including lipid‐rich plaque [LRP] and non‐lipid‐rich plaque [non‐LRP]) after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Background Different initial lesion characteristics may be related to heterogeneous vessel responses after DES implantation. However, the vessel response in patients with CTO and non‐CTO lesions after stenting is unclear. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 64 patients with 68 target lesions. All of the patients underwent OCT imaging immediate after stenting and 6 months after stenting. LRP was defined as the plaque with lipid content in ≥2 quadrants. Non‐LRP consisted of fibrous, fibrocalcific plaque, and lipid plaque with less than 2 quadrants lipid content. Results The malapposition (3.0%, 2.6% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.022), tissue protrusion (15.0% vs. 11.0% vs. 6.4%, P 
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.26969