Ecophysiological studies of Sonoran Desert plants. IV. Seasonal photosynthetic capacities of Acacia greggii and Cercidium microphyllum

The gas exchange and water relations of two Sonoran Desert plants were measured throughout a 12 month period. Seasonal photosynthesis patterns of both species followed the seasonal variation in soil and plant water potential. Acacia greggii, a winter deciduous shrub, appears to be fall active since...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 1978, Vol.37 (2), p.221-229
Hauptverfasser: Szarek, S.R, Woodhouse, R.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The gas exchange and water relations of two Sonoran Desert plants were measured throughout a 12 month period. Seasonal photosynthesis patterns of both species followed the seasonal variation in soil and plant water potential. Acacia greggii, a winter deciduous shrub, appears to be fall active since the day-long mean photosynthesis rate was maximum, i.e., 16 mg CO₂$\text{dm}^{-2}\text{h}^{-1}$, at this time. Cercidium microphyllum, a drought deciduous and chlorophyllous-stemmed tree, also appears to be mainly fall active. For this species the day-long mean photosynthesis rate was not in excess of 14 mg CO₂$\text{dm}^{-2}\ \text{h}^{-1}$. Both species initiate leaf production in the spring and neither experiences severe plant water stress. Seasonal minima of dawn plant water potential were -44 and -32 bars for the shrub and tree species, respectively. The two species differ slightly in their tolerance of heat and water stress, since foliated plants of Acacia greggii maintain summer gross photosynthesis. All of the aboveground organs for plants of C. microphyllum are capable of exogenous14CO2assimilation. This species appears to be unique in the magnitude of the photosynthetic production contributed by stems. Seasonal production by stems, leaves and flowers/fruits averaged 72, 24 and 4% of the total carbon gain per tree, respectively. Aboveground gross primary production was over 4.5-fold greater than aboveground net primary production. This difference between these two production estimates is likely due to the very small foliar biomass maintained throughout the year and the energy expenditure required to maintain the metabolically active cells of the chlorophyllous stems.
ISSN:0029-8549
1432-1939
DOI:10.1007/BF00344993