Litigated Cases: The Selection Effect Revisited

Priest and Klein (1984) predicted a 50-percent plaintiff winning rate among litigated cases, independent of the decision standard. Lee and Klerman (2015) specify conditions under which this result would be true. Klerman and Lee (2014), however, show that, under plausible circumstances, selection eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of institutional and theoretical economics 2016-09, Vol.172 (3), p.409-416
1. Verfasser: Schweizer, Urs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Priest and Klein (1984) predicted a 50-percent plaintiff winning rate among litigated cases, independent of the decision standard. Lee and Klerman (2015) specify conditions under which this result would be true. Klerman and Lee (2014), however, show that, under plausible circumstances, selection effects are only partial. The present paper strips a complicated problem down to an easily accessible model where the plaintiff winning rate among litigated cases can be calculated explicitly. In the discrete setting of the present paper, the 50-percent winning rate would hold if and only if the defendant's fault were uniformly distributed.
ISSN:0932-4569
1614-0559
DOI:10.1628/093245616X14534707121207