Arsenic removal from acidic solutions with biogenic ferric precipitates
[Display omitted] •Continuous and rapid arsenic removal with biogenic jarosite was achieved at pH 3.0.•Arsenic removal was inefficient below pH 2.4 due to reduced Fe–As co-precipitation.•As(V) had better sorption characteristics than As(III).•Biogenic jarosite adsorbed arsenic more effectively than...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hazardous materials 2016-04, Vol.306, p.124-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Continuous and rapid arsenic removal with biogenic jarosite was achieved at pH 3.0.•Arsenic removal was inefficient below pH 2.4 due to reduced Fe–As co-precipitation.•As(V) had better sorption characteristics than As(III).•Biogenic jarosite adsorbed arsenic more effectively than synthetic jarosite.
Treatment of acidic solution containing 5g/L of Fe(II) and 10mg/L of As(III) was studied in a system consisting of a biological fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) for iron oxidation, and a gravity settler for iron precipitation and separation of the ferric precipitates. At pH 3.0 and FBR retention time of 5.7h, 96–98% of the added Fe(II) precipitated (99.1% of which was jarosite). The highest iron oxidation and precipitation rates were 1070 and 28mg/L/h, respectively, and were achieved at pH 3.0. Subsequently, the effect of pH on arsenic removal through sorption and/or co-precipitation was examined by gradually decreasing solution pH from 3.0 to 1.6 (feed pH). At pH 3.0, 2.4 and 1.6, the highest arsenic removal efficiencies obtained were 99.5%, 80.1% and 7.1%, respectively. As the system had ferric precipitates in excess, decreased arsenic removal was likely due to reduced co-precipitation at pH |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3894 1873-3336 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.012 |