WHO Guidelines to prevent surgical site infections
Furthermore, results from a 2015 large randomised controlled trial showed no difference in rates of surgical site infection with varying FiO2 concentrations.4 This randomised controlled trial was not included in the WHO meta-analysis.1 The WHO authors do recognise that in low-income and middle-incom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2017-03, Vol.17 (3), p.260-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Furthermore, results from a 2015 large randomised controlled trial showed no difference in rates of surgical site infection with varying FiO2 concentrations.4 This randomised controlled trial was not included in the WHO meta-analysis.1 The WHO authors do recognise that in low-income and middle-income countries, "oxygen availability is low" and that "oxygen and high-flow masks are an additional cost for the health-care facility or patient";1 but more importantly, it is impractical even in high income countries to maintain 80% FiO2 in postoperative extubated patients for 2-6 hours. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30078-6 |