WHO Guidelines to prevent surgical site infections

Furthermore, results from a 2015 large randomised controlled trial showed no difference in rates of surgical site infection with varying FiO2 concentrations.4 This randomised controlled trial was not included in the WHO meta-analysis.1 The WHO authors do recognise that in low-income and middle-incom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet infectious diseases 2017-03, Vol.17 (3), p.260-261
Hauptverfasser: Mellin-Olsen, Jannicke, McDougall, Robert J, Cheng, Davy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Furthermore, results from a 2015 large randomised controlled trial showed no difference in rates of surgical site infection with varying FiO2 concentrations.4 This randomised controlled trial was not included in the WHO meta-analysis.1 The WHO authors do recognise that in low-income and middle-income countries, "oxygen availability is low" and that "oxygen and high-flow masks are an additional cost for the health-care facility or patient";1 but more importantly, it is impractical even in high income countries to maintain 80% FiO2 in postoperative extubated patients for 2-6 hours.
ISSN:1473-3099
1474-4457
DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30078-6