Vertical Gastric Bypass with Fundectomy: Feasibility and 2-Year Follow-Up in a Series of Morbidly Obese Patients

Background Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard procedure for morbid obesity and its results are well known and largely discussed. The major limitation of the procedure is the difficult exploration of the excluded gastric pouch and duodenum. The vertical gastric bypass with fundectom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2017-08, Vol.27 (8), p.2145-2150
Hauptverfasser: Zappa, Marco Antonio, Aiolfi, Alberto, Musolino, Cinzia, Giusti, Maria Paola, Lesti, Giovanni, Porta, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard procedure for morbid obesity and its results are well known and largely discussed. The major limitation of the procedure is the difficult exploration of the excluded gastric pouch and duodenum. The vertical gastric bypass with fundectomy was recently introduced in attempt to overcome these limitations. To date, its effectiveness is debated and outcomes still unclear. The purposes of this study were to describe the vertical gastric bypass with fundectomy and to analyse its outcomes in term of weight loss, complications, and comorbid resolutions. Material and Methods Since January 2012 to July 2014, 30 consecutive patients were enrolled and prospectively followed for a 24-month period. All patients underwent the vertical gastric bypass with fundectomy. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7 days, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months, or whenever necessary. Results Overall, 24 women and six men were enrolled in the study. Mean preoperative BMI was 38.2 ± 8.5 kg/m 2 . No intraoperative complications were reported. Postoperative overall complication rate was 10%. Compliance to the 24-month follow-up was 100%. Mean BMI and excess weight loss (EWL%) were significantly lower compared to baseline ( p  
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-017-2620-y